Article 02 of 03 in this topic

Bid or no bid: a checklist for firms of five to fifty people

Every tender you write costs days you could have spent on paying work. A straightforward way to decide which ones deserve them.

Topic
Deciding whether to bid
Read
2 min
Published
13 Sept 2026
Updated
16 Sept 2026

The short answer

How should a small firm decide whether to bid for a tender?

Ask three questions: can we win it, can we deliver it, and do we want it. Winning means passing the turnover, insurance and accreditation gates, finding a lot you can deliver, having comparable evidence and facing scoring that suits you. Delivering means capacity, geography, TUPE and cash flow. Wanting it means margin, strategy and acceptable risk. Score each point 0, 1 or 2, treat a zero on the gates or on mobilisation as an automatic no, and record every decision so you learn which tenders are worth your time.

A small firm cannot bid for everything, and should not try. A serious tender response takes days of senior time. Spread that across contracts you were never likely to win and you lose twice: the time, and the bid you rushed because of it.

Deciding not to bid is a skill. Here is a checklist that makes the decision quickly and consistently.

Can we win it?

Do we pass the gates?
Turnover, insurance, accreditations, years trading. If the minimum turnover is several times yours, stop. Government guidance has long been that a turnover requirement should not normally exceed twice the contract value, so a test far beyond that is worth querying, but not worth betting a bid on.
Is there a lot or a size we can deliver?
Look at the value per lot, not the headline figure.
Do we have the evidence?
Recent, comparable work with named clients and outcomes you can describe. If the questions ask for three examples and you have one, the score will show it.
Who holds it now?
A long-standing incumbent that has delivered well is hard to displace. A specification that reads like a description of one company's service is a warning sign.
Does the scoring suit us?
Heavy quality and social value weightings favour a firm that can write well about real, local delivery. Price-dominated scoring favours scale.

Can we deliver it?

Capacity
If we won, could we mobilise by the start date without letting existing clients down?
Geography
Can we service every site, or is this realistically regional work in a national wrapper?
People
Does TUPE apply, and do we understand what taking on the current workforce would mean?
Cash flow
Public bodies must pay undisputed invoices within 30 days under the Act, but mobilisation costs come first.

Do we want it?

Margin
At a price that could win, is there a profit?
Strategy
Does it open a buyer, a sector or a region we want, even if the contract itself is marginal?
Risk
Penalties, unlimited liabilities, or KPIs we cannot control.

A simple scoring rule. Score each question 0 (no), 1 (partly) or 2 (yes). Any 0 on "do we pass the gates" or "can we mobilise" is an automatic no. Otherwise, set a threshold that fits your win rate, and write down the score for every decision. Within a year you will know which kinds of tender are worth your time.

How Bidwire helps with the first pass

Each notice in Bidwire carries a small-firm flag and, where one applies, a plain list of reasons it might not suit a small firm: a very large contract, a stated turnover requirement over £5 million, or a need to cover the whole country. Those are worked out from the notice's own figures, not guessed, so you can see exactly why.

Where a notice lets us, it also names a possible incumbent drawn from the buyer's previous awards. Treat that as a lead to check, not a fact.

See what's open in your trade.

One email a week, filtered to what you do and where you work. Free while we build it.

Get the digest

Or browse every contract we track, no account needed